Ongoing monitoring
Every placement we make is re-checked on a schedule for as long as you are with us. If a link disappears, you hear it from us before you notice it in a tool.
We place links where readers already are, then show you exactly where they landed.
After enough campaigns you learn that the difference between a link that works and a link that does nothing is almost never the metric on the domain. It is whether a real person would ever read the page it sits on. We select for that first and let the metrics follow.
Every placement we make is re-checked on a schedule for as long as you are with us. If a link disappears, you hear it from us before you notice it in a tool.
Publishers in Polish, Ukrainian, German and Spanish, approached in their own language by people who speak it. Translated outreach reads as translated outreach and gets ignored.
Longer campaigns built around something worth writing about — original data, a strong opinion, a tool. Slower to start, but the coverage tends to keep arriving after the campaign ends.
If the page you want to build links to is not worth linking to yet, we will say so, and we can help fix it. Building links to a thin page is money spent teaching people the page is thin.
Yes. Reports can go out unbranded or under your own, and we are used to being the party that never speaks to the end client.
You always do. Nothing is pitched to a site you have not seen and signed off. If you want to be involved in the drafting as well, that is fine too.
Placement and indexation are different problems. A link can be live and correct for weeks before a crawler gets to that page, particularly on smaller publishers. We report the live URL on the day it publishes so you are never waiting on a tool to tell you the work happened.
Sometimes, and it depends entirely on the page. We will look at it and give you an honest read on whether publishers will take it.
By placement, on the publisher, agreed before we start. There is no bulk discount for volume because volume is not what we are selling.
A profile audit on its own is worthwhile and plenty of people stop there. For placements, anything under a few months tends not to tell you much either way.
If a placement did not happen, the report says which one and why. Campaigns that only ever report successes are hiding the interesting part.
Reports are written on the assumption that somebody sceptical will read them. Every placement carries the live URL, the anchor used, the target page, the publication date and a short note explaining why that publisher was on the list in the first place.
You get a spreadsheet and a short written summary. The spreadsheet is the record; the summary is there so that whoever forwards it to a finance director does not have to interpret it themselves.
Alongside new placements, each report lists everything we re-checked from previous cycles and its current state. Links that disappeared appear in the report as clearly as links that went live.
Coverage grew out of the work rather than a plan. These are the areas where we have publishers we trust and editors who take our calls.
If you are still comparing options, the site below covers a lot of the same ground from a different angle and is worth an hour of your time:
If you want to test us, commission the smallest thing on the list. We would rather earn a larger engagement than negotiate for one up front.